4 UK NEWSPAPERS, AIDED AND ABETTED BY
THE THREE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES
AND THE METROPOLITAN POLICE
ETC’ CORRUPTED UK CHILDREN…!
Please note, the answers given to the ‘virtual interview’ questions in this exposé/article, are (by and large) in the ‘Public Domain’. See the TRUTH’s editorial page (the link to which can be found on the main contents page) for more.
This exposé, by far, and of all the other revealing articles in the TRUTH, is the most alarming. Chiefly because, it relates to the lack of actual concern over what was deemed to be the corruption of children by sexually explicit material, and those involved in what amounts to a conspiracy (the involvement of at least five people according to the film ‘Snake Eyes’).
All of the above adverts collectively came from the same Saturday publications of: the STAR, the SUN and the Mirror newspapers in 1992, while the significance of that will follow this introduction.
As you will note, the Sexually explicit, HARDCORE videos and magazines could be paid for with cash and Postal Orders, both of which can be sent by anyone of any age, including minors (under 16 years of age) and juveniles (those aged 17 and 16 years).
In order to evaluate the content of the magazines (videos needing a VCR in order to watch them), I ordered 3 Scan Magazines (see top left corner of picture above) from an advert that appeared in all three newspapers. I paid for them by Postal Order and in return received 3 Scan magazines.
What I discovered, the sexually explicit content and the level of corruption by those mentioned herein, is very much what lead me to produce, print and distribute the first of three issues of the TRUTH in 1994 and with this particular exposé as the centre page article. In 2000, which was when I bought my first PC, I took advantage of updating and producing the magazine in colour and on a far greater scale, more than just the 30+ page A4 size publication of 1994. Thereby making it available to a wider, global audience.
If anything, as noted in the TRUTH’s article: ‘The TRUTH about the LIES about PORN!’ It was Carlton TV’s (now ITV) corrupt 1992 ‘This Week’ programme – produced in conjunction with the results of an equally corrupt (unimpartial) survey by Cosmopolitan magazine, itself and the programme lead by Labour MP Dawn Primarolo and Catherine Itzen and that mentioned in the article – that prompted me to question, not just their concern, which was proven to be political, but that of others as you will come to realise and note.
I subsequently removed some (not all) of the sexually explicit pages from the magazines and either hand delivered or sent them to numerous people. I also made Labour MP Clare Short, Mary Whitehouse, Detective superintendent Michael Hames and New Scotland Yard aware of the following with the letter I either sent or hand delivered to their place of work:
Dear Clare Short, Mary Whitehouse, Detective superintendent Michael Hames and New Scotland Yard!! Enclosed find a copy of a letter sent to London weekly advertiser, for attention of: Mrs Gina Wilson. Regarding the fact that London weekly advertiser is aiding and abetting the sale of sexually explicit adult material (see sample page from a magazine enclosed) to minors (under 16’s) by printing adverts for sexually explicit adult material, with payment by cash & postal orders indicated as the method of payment (as well as cheques, which can only be sent by those aged 16 and over).
NB. This last point has been made known to Clare Short and Mary Whitehouse, by hand and recorded delivery.
The overall question is: What, if anything, are you going to do about it?
The answer transpired to be, nothing, or as the Pythons once said: ‘Bugger all. Not a sausage.’
Suspecting that to be the case, I added these two points:
Ignore, do nothing about the prevention of the sale of sexually HARDCORE (explicit) adult material to MINORS, and you will be:
1) Aiding and abetting the sale of said material to minors.
2) Condoning the sale of said material to minors.
I also sent the letter to several prominent figures, outlining the exercise and including one or more pages from the magazines:
DPP is the Department of Public Prosecutions. They, above all others, should be the most concerned after the government and the other two main political parties, while ‘Watchdog’ has been the BBC’s long running consumer TV series at the time!
It is worth noting that, I phoned the BBC and had them confirm the fact that they received the Registered letter and magazine pages, of which I deliberately kept back two (see next for a description).
In general, and as with what were sexually explicit images in videos passed by the BBFC (British Board of Film Censors originally, later changed to BBF Classification) for rental from video shops, part of the offensive image was masked by a coloured sticker. In one particular full page photo, which, along with the other, I still have, far from the sticker covering the engorged head of the man’s ‘erection’ prior to him climaxing, an obscenity in itself under the obscene publications act until 1996, the sticker had somehow become displaced and had slipped down to the female model’s cleavage. Full page photo number two: Although a sticker covered the female model’s vulva, the text, which, even in 2003 and no doubt today, was deemed obscene, leaves nothing to the imagination, along with which part of the other person’s anatomy is being inserted into the woman’s vulva (clue, it is what one boxer hits another boxer with, their clenched…!).
For those of you unfamiliar with printing at that time, full colour printing, which required 4 plates (1 for each primary colour + black), was charged at a minimum run of 1,000. In that respect, you paid the 1,000 run price irrespective of the amount printed up to 1,000. That meant, at the very minimum, at least 1,000 copies of those ‘obscene’ images were printed and distributed to whoever bought the magazines from the Star, the Sun and the Mirror.
As a result of the address to which the 3 scan magazines were sent to being sold to someone else (see NEXT…!) I received the following invitation to send 2 first class stamps in return for a catalogue of HARDCORE video-films…!
The catalogue contained the following page. Note the titles of the 4th and 5th films. Also note the full colour sleeve and 3 titles of/on a Colour Climax video, No 2 on the catalogue list, a video that also features films 1 and 3, ‘Raped and Abused’ being the third on the catalogue list.
In the interest of further research, following the changes in UK censorship in 1996 with regard to sexually explicit videos, I visited Amsterdam the weekend of the Euros cup final at Wembley stadium and can confirm the availability of that type of material (in particular, bestiality).
That means, in addition to the magazines, the content of which was both sexually explicit and obscene, the recipient now had a gateway to wholly obscene material (bestiality and staged rape the main concern); however, it doesn’t end there by any stretch of the imagination. In point of fact, in 2003 it got worse!
As an introduction to what the future held and who the main newspaper advertiser was, read and view the following item:
For your further interest and consideration, I have re-edited (including correcting punctuation) the item opposite, which appeared on the back of issue 1 of the printed TRUTH.
***Late Update***
“Scandal part 2”. Sunday sport, dated 21/November/1993, Investigated “Obscene videos etc” & found – surprise, surprise – that one of its own “Captain Porno-SEX” mail order/retail advertisers was selling films that included bestiality! In particular, an advert “Endorsed” with & by the Sport’s own Christchurch candidate: Ms Tara Bardot (see ‘Love & kisses Tara’ below the Sun says in newspaper advert collage above). However, whereas “the TRUTH” did not mention the address, the Sport blatantly did! Posing the question: Was the Sport’s article a surreptitious promotional advert?
Note, ‘Captain Porno-sex’ was the name the TRUTH came up with for a fictitious character, one who, as noted by the adverts above, was akin to one of Batman’s arch-enemies, by way of an example.
Ultimately: 1) The Star, The Sun, The Mirror and the Daily-SPORT (see next), along with the British Government (VAT on the ADVERTS, etc’), profited from the sale and supply of:
a) sexually explicit material to those below 18 years of age, children as they now are under the UN’s rights of a child article 1. b) Obscene, Depraved, corrupt (and Paedographic) material to both adults and those under 18 years of age and notably Children, according to article 1 of the United Nations Convention on the rights of a child.
2) Everyone else named above and in issue 1 of the printed TRUTH! Is, therefore, guilty of aiding and abetting the sale and supply of: a) Sexually explicit material to those under 18 years of age and b) Obscene Depraved, corrupt (and Paedographic) material to both adults and those under 18 years of age, in other words, Children!
Be concerned…be very concerned, because none of those exposed and named above, and, moreover, the Metropolitan police, are in the slightest bit concerned as noted by their contempt for ‘the TRUTH!’
From before 2001, the Sport was the only newspaper to still carry adverts for sexually explicit material as the following advert, one that comes from the Daily Sport dated September 12 2001, confirms. Also note the colour video sleeve of ‘Pure Anal’, just one of numerous Private films that were approved for sale through licensed sex shops by the BBFC (British Board of Film Classifications) from 1996. Thereby proving that the film is genuine…!
Furthermore, on June 10 2002, PC Anne Linton and another female PC stationed at Charring Cross Police station confirmed receiving these 2 items, which, thus far, they, like everyone else, have treated ‘the TRUTH’ with the same obscene, depraved, corrupt contempt that a sexual predator has for their victim…!
The TRUTH’s analogy being: Just as a woman might say to a sexual predator! "What part of NO! do you not fully comprehend", then what part of the TRUTH! do YOU not fully comprehend, "WORD for WORD?"
As before, the advertiser welcomes payment by CASH and POSTAL ORDER…!
As to what the British Governments since John Major was PM etc’ could, SHOULD have done, this article from the front page of the “Daily Mail”, dated Monday November 13 1995, spells it out quite clearly:
The only reason for the British Government, since 1993, to not issue a ‘Proscription’ against these very expensive display adverts is plain and simple. The Government made 17.5% in VAT on the adverts.
As a result of the 4 named Newspapers offering sexually explicit, HARDCORE material for as little as £10-00, while the price of a daily Newspaper = 20 pence (approx), then juveniles, who can be sexually active under UK law, have no need, whatsoever, to pass themselves off as 18+ adults in order to buy TAME! top shelf magazines, let alone send away for sexually explicit video films as advertised in top shelf magazines for £20-00+, which is twice the price of those advertised in the national newspapers for just £10-00…! Note, anyone who suggests otherwise is MORONIC! (When someone of normal intelligence does or says something stupid.)
Keep reading, as it gets seriously worse, and for all those concerned.
The fact that the Star, Sun and Mirror newspapers no longer (in/as from/before, 2000 AD) carried such adverts as the ones they accepted and printed before, during and after 1994 AD, does not mean that they, along with those named and shamed, as they rightly should be, by “the TRUTH!” as co-conspirators to the Metropolitan Police, should escape justice, being that which the TRUTH equally stands for, while the fact that they have, only serves to prove the point that the Metropolitan Police LIED! When, after successfully prosecuting Lord Archer for perjury, the Police claimed that they were not afraid to prosecute people, irrespective of how famous they are! After a Lord, the next would be a member of royalty.
NB. At the time of sending the TRUTH to Tony Blair by “Recorded Delivery” on 25 July 1994 (see evidence outlined above), he was just another MP; the shadow leader, in fact.
ALSO note: The fact that the ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) boast of checking 850 adverts each month, indicates that they could not have missed the above adverts, unless, like most Premier league VAR’s (Video Assistant Referees), they were looking elsewhere, thereby making the ASA culpable in the long, 27 years plus, conspiracy as well.
26th October 2002. And the TRUTH notes that the BBFC has given the film “Devil in Miss Jones” an R18 classification (R = sale Restricted to licensed sex shops), even though the female star uses a SNAKE for sexual gratification in the same way that: 1) women use vibrators and 2) US President Bill Clinton was accused of having sexual relations with White House intern, Monica Lewinsky (a cigar canister was mentioned).
Furthermore, since this film can only be sold in Licensed sex shops, while part of the License fee goes towards paying officers from Charring Cross Police Station to regularly monitor the items being sold in and around London’s Soho (the address of the BBFC at the time), then it is both clear and obvious that PC Anne Linton (see ‘How the police can, and in one case did, corrupt taped interviews’) and or her colleagues, have conspired with the BBFC etc in aiding and abetting the sale and supply of a film that depicts actual “Bestiality” to minors, juveniles and adults….! (See next.)
In as much as the former head of the BBFC, James Ferman, was replaced by Robin Duval sometime after Labour came to power in 1997 following the arrangement with John Major’s Government to pass hardcore erotica for sale in licensed sex shops, Mr Duval, in an interview for Channel 5’s ‘Sex and Shopping’, narrated by Davina McCall, indicated that: ‘The BBFC, realising that anyone of any age could watch any film passed by the BBFC, including R18, sexually explicit, hardcore images, is happy for anyone of any age to view them.’
The TRUTH says: so what, then, is the purpose of film classifications?
Answer: On that indication, nothing whatsoever.
For the record, although I watched the original series, I recorded that particular stand out edition of ‘Sex and Shopping’ when it was shown on the ‘Bravo’ channel, which I have on DVD.
On another point, and to the BBFC, itself:
What does the ‘E’ classification stand for?
BBFC: ‘E means the video, DVD or game is Exempt from classification.’
Has the BBFC, from 1994 onwards, ever given an ‘E’ exempt from classification to a video that includes several uses of what the BBFC regards as strong language?
BBFC: ‘Yes, the BBFC, post 1994, gave a video that included several uses of strong language an “E” exempt from classification.’
Ordinarily, what classification would a film that included that amount of strong language receive?
BBFC: ‘A 15 classification at the very least.’
Note. Yes, you've guessed it, I own that very video on DVD!
POLICE CORRUPTION:
Since the word uncorrupt is synonymous with impartial and unprejudicial, it follows that, unimpartial and prejudicial are synonymous with corrupt!
In September 2003, the TRUTH sent a fax to New Scotland Yard (Note, the TRUTH has retained and or has copies of all its communications by fax and e-mail):
In the box below is the copy & paste of an e mail that 1 of our agents received:
Subject: Best Child Pornography Site
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 15:35:15 -0400 (EST)
From: Tyler Chloe <Davinder_Alvira@yahoo.com>
As the TRUTH has proven (see the website) YOU have, and continue to, aid and abet:
1) The sale and supply of sexually explicit material and obscene material to minors and juveniles
2) Those who profit and gain from the sale and supply of sexually explicit material and obscene material to minors and juveniles.
Therefore if YOU treat this fax with YOUR usual Corrupt, Contemptuous attitude then…!
Take note, this fax is sent by PC fax, which means that the TRUTH has a record of its contents and proof that YOU received it…!
020 7230 4276 [New Scotland Yard’s fax number at the time]
The fax also included this:
Subject: We sell child porno!
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:07:55 -0400 (EST)
From: Hunter Caleb <Mersey_Rizwan@hotmail.com>
Therefore, by the Police not going after, and continuing to not go after those responsible for aiding and abetting the sale and supply of sexually explicit material, age restricted material and obscene material (in films, pictures and print = books etc’) to minors and juveniles, now ‘Children’, and obscene material (in films, pictures and print = books etc’) to adults, as outlined above, the Police acted: unimpartially, prejudicially and, moreover, corruptly, as this advert from a page of the ‘SPORT’ further proves:
The not so clear yellow small print reads: ‘If you buy this paper today at 40p and see pages 2 and 3, you will get XXX Raider magazine for just…
Upon reading the “masthead” above, you might conclude that the October 9 2003 edition of the Sport is “10p today”. In fact, it isn’t until you read the small print that you realise…! “If you buy this paper today you will get “Raider” magazine for just…10p today.” That, in itself, is misleading, as the order form (see next) clearly indicates the total price is, in fact, £2-00, and is payable by “Cash and Postal order” as well!
Since the “corrupt” British Police Force (since 1993), and, in particular, PC Anne Linton and PC Steel of Charring Cross Police Station, aided and abetted by the DPP and CPS, continued to aid and abet the sale and supply of sexually explicit material and age restricted material – like that which appears in “Raider” magazine – to minors (under 16’s) and juveniles, now children, then, in the name of “Truth and Justice”, being that which the TRUTH! stands for, and public interest – moreover, yours, if you were a parent of young children in 2003 and now – here is an indication of the images in the magazine, images that I scanned into my PC and still have as evidence:
Centrespread featured a female and two men. Sex acts included all that you could see in a hardcore film, including Double Penetration (one male model’s phallus in the woman’s vulva and the other one in her rectum).
Put simply, if they were stills from a hardcore video or DVD, which is very much the proven case with regard to the scan magazine images, the video/DVD would have been given an R18 certificate and could only be sold in licensed sex shops; certainly not in newsagents as they were at the time.
Not so, however, one of the spreads mentioned on the cover (the boxer one intimated above), as that sexual act, one practised, in general, when two or more women are sexually intimate, was deemed obscene at the time.
As noted above, from the text in relation to the Sport’s fuller advert for videos, PC Anne Linton and PC Steel were made aware of the availability and distribution of sexually explicit material, along with material that, prior to 1996, was obscene, and as long ago as September 12 2001, over 2 years before the ‘Raider’ offer in the same paper. In that respect, PC’s Linton and Steel are guilty of aiding and abetting the sale and supply of sexually explicit material to Children.
PO A Linton. Acting on information provided by someone other than myself (1993) and the TRUTH, you seized a quantity of sexually explicit video tapes that were being exclusively sold to adults, as mentioned at the start of the TRUTH’s article: ‘the TRUTH about rape’?
PO A Linton: ‘Yes.’
That rather suggests one or both of the following:
1 You, along with everyone else who chose to ignore the evidence outlined in this and previous articles, are more than happy for children to watch sexually explicit videos/DVD’s that are classified R18 (sale Restricted to licensed sex shops).
2 There is a secret bill entitled ‘Freedom of the press’, wherein, the press cannot be prosecuted for and are absolved of any crimes short of murder.
There is, however, a third, one that seriously beggars belief.
3 In his act, dearly departed and much missed US stand-up comic Bill Hicks made the point that ‘it’s only all those non-taxed drugs that are bad for you’. You will need to read the TRUTH’s article, ‘the TRUTH about Rape’ to better understand that in full.
A valid point about covering up the TRUTH was made in the episode of Columbo entitled: ‘The bye-bye sky high IQ murder case’. The sleuth makes the following point to an accountant, one that Columbo suspects has been given a promotion in order to cover up embezzlement by the murderer: ‘Any accountant who is aware of a felony, he becomes an accessory to that felony unless he reports it to the proper authorities.’ I dare say that, if he was talking to someone else, a ‘police officer’ in one episode, he would have said the same thing; it not applying just to accountants, but anyone.
Mum X, from Channel 4’s ‘Mums make porn’ 3 part series, what do you think about all of that?
Mum X: Speechless.
Okay, would your fair assessment of those involved in the conspiracy, including Channel 4, be that they were Good or Evil?
Mum X: ‘Undeniably EVIL!’
That last question and answer sum up the logic of most, if not all of the interviews in the TRUTH. Certain things in life are a forgone conclusion!
On a comparative note:
1) Just as the supply of Erotographic material to consenting adults can be compared to that of an adult contact service (devoid of either professional or mercenary whores), it goes without saying that:
2) Aiding and abetting the sale and supply of Sexually explicit material, age restricted material, and obscene material (sexual acts between humans and animals etc) to children, can be compared to a service that aids and abets the supply of young children to PAEDOPHILES…!
Note. If you haven’t as yet come across the advert from an edition of ‘Tarrant on TV’, the message is plain and simple:
‘Doing nothing is taking part’
Added to that, there is this attributed to Burke:
“All that is required for EVIL to triumph is for good men to do nothing!”
If the above exposé and revelation of child corruption were not enough, there is more to follow (see link bottom right).
Update: August 13 2021.
Following the headline of an article from today’s edition of the Metro:
The TRUTH knows, only too well, that is an irrefutable LIE.
How Met Commissioner, Cressida Dick LIED!
Met Commissioner, Cressida Dick. Of those named in this exposé and conspiracy along with amazon/KDP [see link below], are any of them ‘Above the law’?
Met Commissioner: ‘As mentioned in your article: “Spot the difference: Tiananmen square and Trafalgar square” The police take their orders from Downing Street, and so the British Government/Conservative party, they being the Political party that was the Government in 1994 and since 2019 to date, is/are above the law.’
Right, and so you unequivocally and irrefutably LIED?
Met Commissioner: ‘Yes, I unequivocally and irrefutably lied.’
Furthermore, Commissioner, if you fail to investigate this exposé along with that of amazon/KDP exposing children to the most obscene pornography imaginable, and, moreover, fail to investigate those named herein and below [the full list follows this], then that would be an additional lie for each one you fail to investigate.
Met Commissioner: ‘Yes. By failing to investigate everyone mentioned in the TRUTH’s exposé and conspiracy, I will have lied for each one of those mentioned that I don’t investigate.’
As you will have possibly noticed from the above photo of Met Commissioner Cressida Dick, her claim that ‘No one is above the law’ was made in response to a listener who took part in a phone-in on LBC radio. Naturally, the TRUTH has sent an e-mail to LBC radio, making them aware of this and several other exposés.
As always, it goes without saying that, if LBC radio as with everyone else mentioned on the list that Met Commissioner Cressida Dick needs to and should investigate (excluding the first and second mentioned, thereon) chooses to ignore the TRUTH’s e-mail, then they, LBC radio, become and are as complicit as everyone mentioned on the list that now follows, they being just some of the people and the organisations the evidence was sent to; either pages from the scan magazines, a letter, or other, or issue 1 of the printed TRUTH:
British Government and Conservative party, Education Secretary Gavin Williamson (see ‘Exposed: Boris Johnson’s contempt for the safety of women’); The four named newspapers: Mirror, Sun, Star and the Sport; Labour Party and Liberal Party; New Scotland Yard, PO Anne Linton as she was in 2003 and PO Steel; ITV (Formerly Carlton TV), BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation), the BBC‘s programmes complaint unit and Channel 4. Mary Whitehouse (now Deceased). London weekly advertiser, Evening Standard and Cosmopolitan UK. ITC (replaced by the ASA), ASA (Advertising Standards Authority) and BBFC (British Board of Film Classifications). Professional Association of Teachers. Lastly, DPP (Department of Public Prosecutions) and CPS (Crown Prosecution Service), they being the two bodies who decide if a case should be prosecuted in the UK, and anyone else not listed.
In conclusion:
The failure of the police to pursue (investigate) what was and still is very much a ‘Crimestoppers’ report, one that dates from 1992 (28 years), is only surpassed (outdone) by that of the police ignoring what amounts to the murder weapon in a murder case!
Incidentally, the TRUTH made ‘Crimestoppers’ aware of the fact that amazon not only sells standard and obscene pornographic DVD’s but that the sexually explicit and obscene covers of the DVD’s can be viewed by children.
The TRUTH also made the following aware of its exposé: ‘amazon sells pornographic and obscene DVD’s’.
The ASA, BBFC, BBC news, ITV News, Channel 4 News, Channel 5 News, SKY News, the Daily Mail, the Evening Standard and the Metro.
Footnote: Having published this 26 years update of the original printed TRUTH from and since 1994 to the internet, the TRUTH has contacted, by e-mail, one or more of those involved in the corruption and lies outlined in this article, while not necessarily the printed and broadcast British media who covered up said corruption and lies; in particular, the Conservative party (British Government), Gavin Williamson (Education Secretary) and the Liberal Democrat party.
Unfortunately, neither the Labour party or MET police post their e-mail address on their web site, a suggesting that they, in Michael Howard's words: 'Have something to hide', unlike the TRUTH (see below).
With computers and, moreover, the internet, it is now possible for anyone of any age to read what the Supreme court of the United States regard as pornography, and on amazon of all places. That exposé is covered in an article that this page is a direct link, and the only link, to.
To read it, simply click the link named ‘amazon’.
Alternatively, if you require a break, simply click ‘CONTENTS’, and return to this page when you are ready to read:
‘How amazon exposes (your) children to the most obscene pornography imaginable'.
Contact us: the.irrefutable.truth2020@gmail.com