Please note, the answers given to the ‘virtual interview’ questions in this exposé/article, are (by and large) in the ‘Public Domain’. See the TRUTH’s editorial page (the link to which can be found on the main contents page) for more.
Informal notice: In this first part, the term ‘Porn’ means ‘what is commonly referred to as PORN’.
In this highly enlightening and informative 2-part article/exposé you will discover:
1 How trillions of people the whole world over, including thousands of celebrities from the world of sport and entertainment as well as hundreds of politicians, have enjoyed watching what is commonly referred to as PORN!
2 How over a trillion people, including you, have been successfully lied to and corrupted by the American and British – published and broadcast – media.
According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the definition of porn is that which encourages sexual thoughts. In other words, sexual fantasies.
In his stand up comedy routine, the late Bill Hicks pointed out the following fact, one that cannot be refuted (denied).
Before the invention of the camera and later cine cameras and video cameras, let alone books and magazines, before Jesus was born in 0BC, people, mainly parents, had sexual thoughts, leading to male arousal, sexual intercourse, pregnancy and child birth, while, and with the invention of contraception, men and women were having sexual thoughts and sexual intercourse indicative of a line from one of Prince’s songs:
‘You don’t have to make babies to make love’ (have sex).
Sexual thoughts, as everyone reading this knows, are projected onto the individuals ‘mind’s eye’, in much the same way that sexual acts, commonly referred to as PORN, can be and are projected onto Televisions, PC monitors, Laptops, Tablets and phones with video capability.
The more interesting points, however, are these, all of which come from recognised experts:
Dr Miriam Stoppard. In your book that was published to coincide with a late night Carlton TV series presented by Toyah Wilcox, you indicated something rather interesting about sexual thoughts and fantasies.
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘Yes. Women have eight times as many sexual thoughts and fantasies as men.’
Right, so, based on the Supreme court of the United States definition of the word porn that clearly means what?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘Women actually enjoy porn eight times more than men.’
All things considered, then, and I’m thinking, also, about women who resort to self-gratification, irrespective of what they use, the renowned ‘Rabbit’ sex toy being one example, to achieve orgasm, sexual thoughts, as will be seen later, are, themselves?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘What is commonly referred to as PORN!’
Masters & Johnson, America’s most renowned experts on sex. According to your findings on male and female fantasies, how many of the top five were the same?
M&J: ‘Four.’
What did you discover to be the unique female fantasy, and what position on the list was it?
M&J: ‘Sex with a stranger, which was the number 1 fantasy for women.’
By contrast, what was the unique fantasy of men?
M&J: ‘Watching couples have sex.’
A fantasy that men can fulfil by watching sexually explicit videos, etc, correct?
M&J: ‘Most certainly correct.’
Dr Miriam Stoppard. What was the woman’s primary fantasy?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘Sex with multiple partners.’
So, ménages (threesomes), gangbangs and orgies?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘Those are the definitions of multiple partners, and, so, yes.’
The above revelations both throw up and confirm the following:
1> What encourages women to fantasize about sex with multiple partners? Whatever it is, the Supreme court of the United States deems it to be pornography.
2> By that very essence, therefore, the sexual thoughts themselves are what is commonly referred to as PORN!
Susan Phillips. Yourself and Andrew Blake wrote which masterpiece of an adult film?
Susan Phillips: ‘Night Trips. As you say, a masterpiece that won an accredited mainstream film award.’
Describe the premise of the film, if you please?
Susan Phillips: ‘Tori Welles plays a married woman, one that, like so many other women throughout the world, has been corrupted and conditioned to believe that her sexual thoughts are obscene and pornographic. Tori’s therapist refers her to a specialist, played by Porsche Lynn, one who has a machine called a mind scan imager. The purpose of the machine is to transfer Tori’s fantasies onto a large screen using wires with pads at the end, witch then run from the machine to her body.’
So, in effect, the woman’s fantasies are projected onto a screen, one symbolizing, for example, a TV screen rather than the woman’s internal ‘mind imager’?
Susan Phillips: ‘A perfect description. Yes.’
By and large, that which can encourage sexual thoughts, is something that’s been readily available for centuries, and that is books.
Dr Miriam Stoppard. The purpose of the text in a novel is what?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘To encourage the person reading the book to visualise what they are reading by projecting it onto their mind’s eye. The exact same visual aid that we use for mental arithmetic etc.’
So, on that basis, then, if the book is sexual in nature, it’s guaranteed to encourage the reader to have sexual thoughts?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘Without a doubt, most definitely guaranteed.’
Would you agree that sexual intimacy is sexual intimacy whether it’s done in front of a camera or not?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘That’s a rather interesting question. Of course, my answer to it is yes.’
Moreover, other experts, like Dr Andrew Stanway and yourself, and possibly you, in one of your books, have encouraged couples to make what is corruptly referred to as a porn movie?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘Yes. While I would like to point out that it’s erotic.’
A most interesting point, erotic, as in recent years, thanks, in large part, to the internet, some couples, having made a home movie, have uploaded it to one or more internet sites, which the US and UK media, MP’s etc (where applicable) and Channel 4 regard as porn?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ‘You’re right, they all do’.
So, in effect, then, the US and UK media, MP’s etc (where applicable), and Channel 4, regard what men and women, be they heterosexual, bi-sexual, lesbian or homosexual, do in giving and receiving sexual pleasure as pornographic?
Dr Miriam Stoppard: ’Undeniably, yes.’
Thanks to amazon ‘audible’, people can now listen to porn being read to them.
‘Let’s hear it for aural sex’, was the title of a 2-page article in the December 12 2019 publication of the Metro, claimed to be ‘The World’s most popular free newspaper’. The article’s blurb reads: ‘With huge investment and hordes of millennial women among its fans, audio erotica [porn mentioned in the actual article] is going mainstream.’
Two stand out points from the article read: “Don’t skip a beat: as many as 90 percent of women use ‘mental framing’ during sex”. And ‘Lack of visuals is a huge bonus, you can fill in the blanks with your own imagination’.
Imagination being sexual thoughts, which, in turn, is what the Supreme court of the United States define as pornography.
James Ferman, former head of the BBFC (British Board of Film Classifications). In 1996, according to a TV documentary, after a meeting between yourself and a junior Home Office minister, you approved sexually explicit videos including those from ‘Private’?
James Ferman: ‘I most certainly did.’
Prior to that, and during one of your interviews for the BBC’s ‘Film – whichever year it was’ – your reason for not passing sexually explicit films until 1996 was?
James Ferman: ‘They left nothing to the imagination.’
That, I’m sure you’ll agree, is another way of saying, ‘they didn’t encourage sexual thoughts’?
James Ferman: ‘I could not agree with you more. Films that are commonly referred to as porn, don’t encourage sexual thoughts.
I see. And what type of films, film titles in particular, encourage sexual thoughts?
James Ferman: ‘Bound, Basic Instinct and Basic Instinct 2, the remake of The Getaway, Fatal attraction, Nine and a Half Weeks, Eleven Days and Nights, A View to a Kill and Spice World.’
Interesting selection. Why Spice World and A View to a Kill, both of which are PG rated, meaning that, according to the classification notice for PG rated films, in particular, the posters for the first Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter films, they are suitable for general viewing by anyone aged 8 years and over?
James Ferman: ‘The advisory notice for Spice World pointed out the fact that the film included sexual references, while A View to a Kill included four sexual encounters involving Roger Moore’s James Bond character and his female co-stars.’
Specifically!
James Ferman: ‘The pilot of the mini-sub, prior to the open credits, Mayday, Grace Jones’ character, a Russian agent in a hot tub and lastly Tanya Roberts’ character in a shower.’
On that basis, then, you not only approved what, under the Supreme court of the United States ruling, is considered by you to actually be a pornographic video/DVD, but you made it available to children?
James Ferman: ‘According to what I said in the BBC interview, I very much did.’
Thanks to James Ferman’s honesty and evidence, what all of that, along with the Supreme Court of the United States definition of porn, does, is point towards mainstream films, those that encourage sexual thoughts, as being pornographic.
Before I get to the final telling point, there is a need to mention the following:
Cosmopolitan magazine. According to the results of a survey you published in an edition of your monthly magazine aimed at women, what percentage of respondents said they wanted oral sex from their partner?
Cosmopolitan magazine: ‘86%.’
It’s also worth mentioning that, only 50% reciprocated with oral stimulation. One can only wonder as to how many £Millions of tax payers money could have been better used for the NHS, especially with the Coronavirus pandemic, rather than otherwise unnecessary Viagra prescriptions.
All the same, the one doing it, very much like a POV video, would have watched themselves doing it to their partner, who would no-doubt have watched them doing it to them.
It’s not just everyday women but celebrities, too, who admit to the same or something similar.
Cybil Shepherd, mainstream film star. Among your many acting credits is the long running American hit TV series ‘Moonlighting’, in which you starred with a young Bruce Willis?
Cybil Shepherd: ‘I most certainly did.
On a TV chat show, you mentioned something about Elvis Presley.
Cybil Shepherd: ‘As I recall, I said that I taught Elvis how to eat/lick pussy.’
Thank you for being so candid.
Teri Hatcher, following the success of ‘Desperate Housewives’, in which you starred alongside Eva Longoria and others, you appeared on an edition of Channel 4’s Graham Norton chat show?
Teri Hatcher: ‘I did.’
What did you confess about an incident involving yourself and a male masseuse?
Teri Hatcher: ‘Right. As I recall, he was that good, he got me all worked up and wet only to leave me [horny].’
Jonathan Ross. When you first interviewed Madonna, what did the queen of pop confess?
Jonathan Ross: ‘That she had indulged in anal sex.’
It’s worth pointing out that, until 1996, which was when the BBFC approved films that depicted anal sex, anal sex between heterosexual couples was an illegal sex act.
The point of mentioning all of those revelations and by stars of film, TV series and music is, they will have encouraged a percentage of viewers and the TV programme’s audience to have sexual thoughts in relation to what was said by each of those women along with what was said by other celebrities on other TV chat shows and in films and TV programmes that allude to sexual intimacy.
In addition to that, there are, of course, song lyrics, in particular, those of Prince. Love Sexy, Head, Let’s pretend we’re married, Lady cab driver, I hate you and Get off, to mention just some, while Janet Jackson, Michael’s younger sister, alluded to sexual euphoria on one of her CD’s.
Dr Andrew Stanway. In addition to being involved with the groundbreaking video, ‘the Lovers Guide’, a video that, at the time, was said to be pornographic, before 1994 you published a book directed at women?
Dr Andrew Stanway: ‘Yes. “Joy of fantasy”.’
This may come as a shock to those reading this, but, the pages included visual representation of, Rape, incest and bestiality?
Dr Andrew Stanway: ‘Yes. In particular, the bestiality one featured a woman stood near a horse.
As already mentioned, according to the Supreme court of the United States, Dr Stanway’s book is pornographic, as it encourages sexual thoughts, confirmed by that aspect of the book’s title.
On another note, a rather significant one. Dr Andrew Stanway. You were also one of four contributing experts to ‘One to One’, a weekly magazine that began publication in 1988?
Dr Andrew Stanway: ‘Yes.’
According to page 886 of ‘One to One’, a study by a UK woman’s magazine found, among several other things, what percentage of couples had watched themselves have sex in mirrors?
Dr Andrew Stanway: ‘50%.
Ah, yes. There you have the very foundation stone of this first part of this revealing article, the fact that couples, men and women, sexual partners irrespective of the plural number, have watched what is commonly referred to as porn, the very act of sexual relations.
Your parents certainly watched themselves having sexual relations, and so it goes without saying that, men and women since the dawn of time, have likewise done so. Among them are, as stated at the beginning, sexually active celebrities from the world of sport and entertainment, members of your community and those throughout the world, and finally, politicians and heads of state, Kings, Queens and Monarchs, if only to maintain their hereditary line.
Getting people, including everyone reading this revealing article, to admit and come to terms with those very irrefutable facts, however, is down to the second part:
‘The LIES about PORN!’
Informal notice: In this second part, the term ‘Porn’ means ‘what is CORRUPTLY referred to as PORN’.
Ever since the spring of 2020, which was when old stories and exposés were updated and new ones were added, the TRUTH posted numerous tweets on Twitter. Of those, these two stand out:
The first of those, a 70 year old quotation, is mentioned on this internet news magazine’s Editorial page, while the fact that, ‘Offering up as being true & accurate (see second tweet), something that the person(s) so offering it up has failed to check/clarify as being TRUE and accurate’, is an example of a lie, one you will find in the TRUTH’s exposé, ‘How to spot a lie’.
First and foremost, do you, as someone, one of over a trillion people throughout the world, who has no-doubt been successfully lied to and corrupted by the world, American and British – published and broadcast – media, have it in you to, paraphrasing Jack Nicholson’s outburst to Tom Cruise’s character in the film ‘A Few Good Men,’ handle the TRUTH?
Time to find out!
One of, if not the most damaging and negative lies about porn, prior to 1996, was that magazines and videos, commonly referred to as porn, incited sexual violence.
Before the BBFC’s changes in 1996, the unproven assumption was, magazines and videos, commonly referred to as porn, despite the fact that they depicted men and women indulging in sex acts common to the human race since the dawn of time, could encourage sexual violence. If you follow that assumption (another example of a lie) to its obvious, rather than logical, conclusion, it goes without saying that, films that depict violence encourage violence. Action films, in particular.
Taking the point mentioned by stand up comedian Bill Hicks into account, consider the following question ‘word for word’ (that being the first rule of communication), one that, so far, no one other than this internet news magazine, the ‘TRUTH’, has bothered asking:
Why, in 2003, was London 2 thousand times more dangerous for women than Copenhagen, a European country that, along with the Danish Vikings, introduced parts of Britain to RAPE and pillage (robbery and burglary by modern day standards) over 800 years before Colour Climax introduced the world to:
To remind you from the first part: In the 13th century, there were no cameras with which to take photographs let alone full colour printing presses to print ‘sexually explicit material’. As to the answer to the question, all will be revealed in another exposé: ‘the Truth about Rape’.
There now follows a rather interesting and confirming virtual interview with a former Prime Minister.
Tony Blair. Former leader of the opposition party and, subsequently, Prime Minister in 1997. Before, during and after the General election, your mantra was?
Tony Blair: ‘That I would get tough on crime…tough on the cause of crime.’
And did you?
Tony Blair: ‘No.’
In point of fact, Mr Blair, you actually exacerbated it, made it worse than it already was?
Tony Blair: ‘Yes, I exacerbated [increased] it [CRIME].’
In order for you to make such a bold claim as that, you would have to know what the cause of crime was and is, otherwise your claim would have been an out and out lie. Has the British Parliament, at anytime prior to 1994, admitted what the cause of 83% of crime is, including sex crimes against women and children?
Tony Blair: ‘Yes.’
Was the cause of 83% of crime, Sexually explicit material/Porn?
Tony Blair: ‘Most certainly not.’
It is worth pointing out the fact that no Prime Minister will ever 'Get tough on the cause of crime!'
Why is that, Mr Blair?
Tony Blair: ‘The effect it would have on the economy.’
Meaning that?
Tony Blair: ‘Taxation would have to be increased.’
Thank you. Mr Blair, for your honesty. To those reading this, you will find out what the cause of 83% of crime is, and from Tony Blair’s own lips, in the TRUTH’s expose, ‘How Tony Blair’s claim to get tough on the cause of crime transpired to be a lie’, the link to which can be found on the Lies & Corruption contents page.
Furthermore. In another scandalous exposé you will discover how 'Channel 4' covered up the cause of crime and Tony Blair’s lie to get tough on it!
Above all others, Channel 4, understandably, have been the most instrumental and corrupting influence of the lies about porn, from the early 1990’s to the present – 2019. It all began with the misleading (corrupt) ITV programme ‘This Week’, which opened up the results of a corrupt questionnaire in the March 1990 edition of Cosmopolitan to a vastly wider and easily influential (corruptible) audience to that of Cosmo’s mainly female readers.
Having watched the ‘This Week’ programme, I contacted Channel 4’s ‘Right to reply’ programme for the purpose of exposing the lies about porn (evidence of which is presented below), only for Channel 4 to sweep the truth under the proverbial carpet, something they also did when I responded to an on-air invitation for people to ask questions of PM Tony Blair (see 'Furthermore' above).
My question, and I indicated it in the Fax I submitted and still have a copy of, was: Why did Mr Blair lie about ‘Getting tough on crime…tough on the cause of crime’?
On that evidence, not only did Channel 4 contribute to the increase in crime by blatantly covering up Tony Blair’s lie, but, as will be seen in ‘the Truth about Rape’, Channel 4 had and has the blood of every victim of sexual violence stemming from the true cause of crime on its hands. See another one of the TRUTH’s tweets on this below.
In all truth and honesty, the proof of which can be found in the TRUTH’s exposé, ‘Boris Johnson’s contempt for the safety of women’, all of the main tabloid and broadsheet newspapers along with all four Public service TV channels and SKY, have covered up ‘the Truth about Rape’, including the main, 83% cause of crime, and, in some cases, since the original published 1994 exposé.
On 20th March 2019, not only did Channel 4 broadcast yet another influentially corrupt three part programme ‘Mums Make Porn’, but they lied to the five mums involved.
Each of the three parts centred on different aspects: research, scripts and, finally, making a sexually explicit film.
Mum X (name withheld by Channel 4 – the TRUTH has their e-mail reply – an indication that they have something to hide and or be corrupt about), the first of the five mums to be interviewed. You made an interestingly valid point at the start of the programme; however, you failed to run with it.
Mum X: ‘When I was younger, I watched my parents’ porn.’
So, back then, the 1980’s, it was appealing to couples (her parents) and, with it, women like yourself?
Mum X: ‘Yes. That’s what I found from watching it.’
What, according to Channel 4, influenced the other four mums and yourself to make your own ‘porn’ video, as Channel 4 and others corruptly call it?
Mum X: Shocked by the online porn that Channel 4 showed us, and was freely available to young people, we decided to make our own alternative.’ [Extract from a TV listings magazine.]
Okay. Now, here’s the thing, well, two, in fact. First and foremost, such a film would be given an R18 rating – the ‘R’ signifying its sale is restricted to licensed sex shops and even then, to over 18’s, adults and not young people. Secondly, if you instead uploaded it to one of the many internet sites, it would not only be a tear in a very large ocean, but, and with your intention, you would be encouraging children to watch it. That was, as stated, both Channel 4’s and your purpose?
Mum X: speechless at that realization.
On one edition of Channel 4’s ‘Right to reply’, the ITC made this truly laughable point about sexually explicit films:
‘We do not approve of titillating programmes.’
Unfortunately for the ITC that is an irrefutable lie. Just as the opposite of good is evil, the opposite of boring is titillation. Furthermore, you won’t find it in Microsoft Word’s very limited thesaurus, while my Collins Thesaurus, on the other hand, lists these notable synonyms for ‘titillation’: Exciting (the opposite of boring), interesting and thrilling, to name just three.
The ITC also made another stupid and thoughtless point:
‘Such films do not have a plot.’
Excuse me! Question. The James Bond films aside, as noted by James Ferman’s interview above, and ‘Dangerous Liaisons’ and its remake ‘Cruel intentions’, in which the male lead accepts a bet with one female co-star to seduce, corrupt, defile and spurn another female co-star, when was the last time that you, indeed, anyone for that matter, had sexual relations as part of a plot?
And the answer, hopefully, is never, while the only people who have sex as part of a plot are misogynists, something that Judi Dench’s ‘M’ assessed James Bond of being in ‘Goldeneye’, and sexual predators like John Malkovich’s character in ‘Dangerous Liaison’s’. Two types of men that both the ITC and, it has to be said, some TV broadcasters clearly approve of.
Talking of Pierce Brosnan’s Bond character. His second Bond film, ‘Tomorrow never Dies’ is all about the corrupting influence of media mogul Tomorrow. How’s that for irony?
To continue, I would like to get the viewpoint of Mum X from ‘Mums make porn’ about the Supreme court of the United States definition of the word porn.
Mum X: ‘Before, after and during my teens, I dare say teenage girls had thoughts about male sex symbols.’
For example?
Mum X: ‘Rock Hudson, Marlon Brando, Elvis Presley, Cliff Richard, at least two of the Beatles [John and Paul], Tom Jones, Tom Cruise in “Top Gun”, British band members Bros, while for men it would be Sharon Stone in “Basic Instinct”.’
Despite the fact that women have been known to throw their underwear onto the stage at a Tom Jones concert, you’re either being coy or forgetful?
Mum X: ‘Oh, right! Me! At least it better be me for my husband’s sake!’
In 1994 (see editorial page), the Truth made the police aware of the obscene, suggestive nature of Dr Stanway’s book, one that could influence women to have sexual thoughts about rape, bestiality and incest, only for the police to openly ignore it; sweep it under the proverbial carpet. Unfortunately, as will be seen in ‘the TRUTH about Rape’, said action makes the police an accessory:
Furthermore, it’s worth iterating what Burke indicated:
“In order for EVIL to triumph the GOOD woman/man need do nothing!”
Since 1983 and now e-readers, books can and do include the following sex acts, which, at the time of publication, were in breach of the obscene publications act, and, according to the Supreme court of the United States, pornographic: Anal sex, fisting, urination, incest, paedophilia (coveting of a child – anyone below 18 years of age under the United Nations ruling), bestiality (quite a lot, in fact), torture and, more worryingly for women, RAPE! Especially since the books can be read in public and cause the reader to become sexually aroused. A fully-loaded gun was how it was intimated in the film ‘There’s Something About Mary’.
Mum X. How does all that sit with the concerns that at least one of the mothers had?
Mum X: ‘Alarming, totally alarming.’
There’s more, I’m afraid, as this screenprint demonstrates:
For 'Forced' read: 'RAPE!'
As the TRUTH will explain in another exposé, and in fuller detail, by clicking the cover of any book with ‘Look inside’ above the book’s cover on its ‘book details’ page, you can read 11% of the book. The book in the screenprint claims to contain 300 forced sex (RAPE) pornographic stories; that, despite the fact that two of Amazon’s content guidelines were:
1) ‘We don’t accept pornography.’
2) ‘What we deem offensive is probably about what you would expect.’
On the 1st point, amazon told a lie, while on the 2nd point, clearly, amazon does not deem ‘RAPE’ etc to be offensive.
So, from the 300 story book, anyone, a child who’s PC is not parent protected, can read 33 sexually explicit and, by the Supreme court of the United States ruling, pornographic stories!
The truth as to the lie about porn can be traced back to ancient Greece and ancient Rome. For Greece, there now follows a screenprint from the first episode of the second adventure of Sierra’s ‘Zeus, master of Olympus’ city building game. As you will note, the date is 3000 BC!
It is an undeniable fact that, Greece, a continent like that of Italy, France and Spain, existed long before 3000BC. That said, and taking it as the earliest date, what you are about to discover, and from two of the 21 volumes of the Complete Oxford dictionary, is, that two words, key to this exposé, originated from ancient Greece. The main one, ‘Porn’, was and still is, to this very day, included in at least one dictionary and on ‘Wickipedia’, while the other word is ‘Erotic’.
I would like to welcome the UK’s leading author of ‘Genuine’ Erotica, Chris Thomlinson. First and foremost, as I will soon be revealing with a page from the relevant volume of the Complete Oxford Dictionary, the 5,000 year old definition of erotic is?
CT: ‘Sexual love, while erotic comes from Eros, the Greek God of erotic sexual love.’
To clear up any misconceptions by our readers, what did Aphrodite symbolize?
CT: ‘Firstly, each of the Immortals, whether they be Greek or Roman, represented something different. In Aphrodite’s case it was love of the heart.’
That means, Erotic and Porn, two words that originated from ancient Greece and at around the same time, had, as you would expect, two separate meanings (definitions)?
CT: ‘Irrefutably correct.’
For everyone reading this, the moment of the TRUTH about the lies about porn has arrived. Get ready, take a deep breath, as the truth you’ve been lied to and corrupted will amaze you!
Rather than scroll the page up and down as I take you through the key points, each one underlined in red, they have been cut from a copy of the full version and reassembled in order.
As you will note from the added point in red felt tip pen at the bottom of the page, Rome was established in 753BC. If you search ‘Wikipedia’ for the word pornocracy (porn meaning, as you just discovered, prostitute+o+cracy, cracy meaning the dominating influence of the word joined to it by the letter ‘o’) you will discover this:
Pornocracy (from Greek πόρνη "female prostitute" + -κρατία "-cracy" a suffix indicating government or rule) is a government ruled by prostitutes.
The second definition, Pornography, on the other hand, is more interesting, as it pertains to 1858. That means, from 6th century Greece, 2500BC until 1858AD at the least, the historically correct definition of the word porn, meaning prostitute, stood for over 4,358 years until someone chose to corrupt it. The outcome of 2. under Pornography, is: unchaste women are whores. Sexist in the extreme as is the definition of the word ‘bimbo’ in relation to women, despite the fact that Jack Nicholson's character directed the word ‘bimbo’ at a male character in the film ‘Chinatown’.
As you will note from this newspaper cutting, in reference to a London based prostitute named Lindi St Clair, AKA Miss Whiplash, 64 piers and 260 MP’s very much found themselves in a Pornocratic situation, one similar to that of members of Rome’s senate, when she threatened to name and shame them! Incidentally, US senators sit in a senate!
Mum X, from ‘Mums Make Porn’. One of the things you may have noticed from present day internet videos, is the ‘talent’, be they male or female, may call the female talent a whore.
In light of what you and everyone else reading this exposé now knows, since Porn actually means ‘whore’, that may well be the talent simply playing up to the 4,500+ year old definition of Porn?
Mum X: ‘Put like that, you are probably right’.
The next truly enlightenment is, the A4 page pertaining to 'Erotic' from one of the 21 volumes of the Complete Oxford Dictionary. Incidentally, it is worth pointing out that amazon advertises them for sale as a complete set of books, while a short while ago an e-reader version was available.
Note. Sections with a RED ‘Z’ through them are totally non-related words that fall alphabetically between and after the relevant ones.
Again, and as with the relevant words from the previous, each one has been underlined in red and cut from a copy of the full version and reassembled in order.
Not included, at this stage, is ‘Erotology’, the science of love, as its relevance is very much part of ‘The TRUTH about RAPE!’ and another article ‘the TRUTH about the female orgasm!’
The authenticity of Eros is confirmed by this portion of a page from my Concise Oxford dictionary:
James Ferman. You made a cut to the censor’s version of ‘Emmanuelle’. Which scene and why?
James Ferman: ‘As I recall, it was one of the three final scenes that followed on from one another. The particular one I cut was the opium den scene. To me, it wasn’t sex.’
That was your excuse for cutting it? It wasn’t sex?
James Ferman: ‘Very much so and what I said to camera.’
Here’s the thing. As Jean Tripplehorn’s character remarked to Michael Douglas’ character ‘That wasn’t making love’ in “Basic Instinct” it is worth pointing out that, the three scenes from ‘Emmanuelle’, one of which you cut, were part of her journey of erotic liberation under the guidance of Mario. One that brought sexual fulfilment and, to quote Emmanuelle, frequent orgasms.
Taking all of that into consideration. You are right, it wasn’t sex. What it was, however, was erotic sexual love. In other words, making love.
In the past, the British media have disparagingly claimed that the women who appear in what are lyingly called porn films fake their pleasure (orgasms), despite some of them squirting (the ultimate female orgasm).
Susan Quilliam. According to a review of your book ‘Women on sex’, what percentage of women failed to climax during sex?
Susan Quilliam: ‘90%.’
It goes without saying, then, that those same members of the British media, both deride and disparage that 90% of women?
Susan Quilliam: ‘Most certainly they do. A case of failing to engage their brains before making such a sexist remark about women.’
One Channel 5 or Channel 4 programme featured three British men who got to meet their erotic adult film idols. During the programme, the makers made a point, a most negative one, in fact, about the need for lubrication during sex.
Susan Quilliam. What would be your recommendation, other than oral sex prior to sexual intercourse, for the 90% of women mentioned in your previous answer?
Susan Quilliam: ‘Plain and simple, lubrication.’
On another negative point by the media, one about the lack of scripted words, who, other than ourselves, scripts what we say in everyday conversations?
In rounding this second part up, I would first like to bring back Chris.
In your well-read erotic story, ‘the Handyman’, he makes what point to Samantha about the erotic novel she was reading?
Chris: ‘Having read an extract, he says, “Well, Sam, if they were to make a film of your book, women like you would no doubt call it porn!”.’
Mum X. As stated and confirmed, Channel 4 produced the three part series: ‘Mums Make Porn’.
Mum X: ‘Yes.’
That means, Channel 4, to some degree, financed and profited from the making of the mums’ Porn video as Channel 4 lyingly put it.
That brings us onto the crux of the situation. That because the talent are paid to make a film depicting erotic sexual love, the women, more so than the men, are whores.
Chris Thomlinson. The purpose of safe sexual intimacy is?
CT: ‘To give women sexual pleasure.’ [A fuller version can be found in another article]
So, plain and simple, what man, in his right mind or not, is going to pay a prostitute for the privilege of giving her sexual pleasure?
CT: ‘In the majority, and from reading “the Happy Hooker”, written by and about a former prostitute, none.’
Then, of course, there is the practice of 'no kissing' by prostitutes. The reason for that is?
CT: ‘The romantic aspect, which is very much present in erotic films of the last century.’
Fact. The Yorkshire ripper was also found guilty of raping over 10 of the prostitutes he brutally murdered.
The obscene aspect of pornography, the writings of prostitutes, is, it could glamorise prostitution and, in doing so, encourage children (under 18’s) to become child prostitutes, something that, not necessarily because of the lies, has, nevertheless, escalated in the UK.
Mum X. Before we close this article, could you summarise what you and those reading it have learnt so far?
Mum X: ‘First and most worrying, is the fact that the British government, irrespective of which political party is in power, has little to no interest in reducing crime.
‘According to Dr Miriam Stoppard, women enjoy what the Supreme court of the United States defines as porn, eight times more than men.
‘The vast majority of British women, those born in and residing in the UK, understandably, prefer to consume what is corruptly labelled porn in the privacy of their thoughts, whether it’s inspired by books, including audio books and anything else that encourages sexual thoughts, while men are more open to watching real people having real sexual intimacy as well as books.
‘The 4,500 year old definition of porn is prostitute, while sexual love is the 5,000 year old definition of Erotic.
‘Subsequently, the depiction of erotic sexual love, whether it be written, in print, a painting, a drawing, a photo, or a collection of photographic images, such as that of a film, is erotica and certainly not porn.’
That, if I can stop you right there, is an interesting point. Moreover, and you are right to some extent, there is more to it than that. See if you can work it out from these clues:
Pornography [porn+o+graphy] is, as noted above, the writings of prostitutes. Similarly, though, photography and filmography relate to images (the first still the second moving images), while the Oscars include a cinematography award (presented to those associated with camera and lighting in a film).
Mum X: ‘I see. Most informative. Especially the ‘graphy’ aspect, which, as with ‘Pornography’, is connected using the letter ‘o’. Thinking about it, then, ‘erotography’ and not ‘pornography’ [the same amount of letters = 11] is the correct word to use for the depiction and description of what is, essentially: ‘Erotic sexual love!’ Furthermore, and as mentioned, to not do so, the use of the word porn in relation to erotic sexual love, classes ALL lawfully unchaste women as WHORES!’
Unfortunately, it’s probably too late to undo the lies and corruption that were, are unequivocally deep rooted in the minds of over a trillion people and return to making films for couples, despite the efforts of “Mums make porn” and the TRUTH.’
The following two ‘Significant’ questions are best asked by Mum X, from ‘Mums Make Porn’.
1) UK and US media, UK MP’s (Members of Parliament), the police (where applicable) and Channel 4, BBC, ITV, Channel 5, and other broadcasters (where applicable), did you 1) Clarify the definition of the word ‘porn’ with the Complete Oxford Dictionary beforehand?
The answer from those that question 1 is applicable to is: ‘NO’ and so they undeniably LIED.
2) To those of you who clarified the fact that the historically correct definition of the word porn is prostitute, did you choose to ignore the historically correct definition and subsequently lie?
The answer from those question 2 is applicable and relevant to is: ‘Yes. They most certainly and undeniably LIED!’
Note. The definitions of words serve a purpose, yes, but only so long as they are NOT corrupted.
Ultimately, those who have lied, all but lied in a court of law, one where, in doing so, is perjury, a crime punishable by a prison sentence akin to that served by two Conservative party MP’s, Jonathan Aitken and Jeffrey Archer.
In conclusion dear reader. By corruptly and misleadingly citing what is erotica as an evil, those who did so and will, no doubt, continue to do so, are responsible for the escalation of sex crimes, for falsely pursuing the innocent while ignoring the guilty, that which Tony Blair, himself, at the start of this article, intimated at being the TRUE cause of crime, and, therefore, as with Channel 4, have the blood of the victims of RAPE on their vile hands!
On a lighter note. According to research. Given a choice between:
1) Films of sexual-/violence and 2) Films of Erotic, sexual love, 84% of British women, aged 24 to 40, prefer men to watch and be influenced by films of Erotic sexual love. Try telling that to the BBFC, the UK media, the Police and MP’s (scores of who are women).
Footnote: Having published this 26 years update of the original printed TRUTH from and since 1994, the TRUTH has contacted, by e-mail, those involved in the corruption and lies outlined in this article, including the printed and broadcast British media who dispensed the corrupting lies.
Understandably, that is quite a lot to take in, while you may wish to re-read some, most or, indeed, all of it again, before moving onto the connecting article: ‘The TRUTH about RAPE!’ something that every man, woman and parent should read.
If you wish to take a break, first, possibly a good idea, click the ‘CONTENTS’ page link.
Then, when you are ready to discover ‘The TRUTH about RAPE!’, return to this article and click the link 'RAPE!' below.
